1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is the operator of the instant training establishment, who conducted workplace skill development training for the unemployed, etc. at the Cdriving Institute located in Busan Dong-gu, Busan (hereinafter “instant training establishment”).

B. On January 21, 2016, the Defendant conducted direction and supervision of the instant training establishment on the following grounds: (a) on February 19, 2016, the Defendant conducted training for 18 persons exceeding 15 training personnel by integrating the complete training course of construction machinery, the complete training course of construction machinery, and the training course of construction machinery full-time training; (b) on the ground that “the Plaintiff provided the three above courses, such as teaching the trainees of the three courses conducted at the same time, while conducting training, on the ground that two trainees of construction machinery full-time training equipment are employed together; (c) the Plaintiff, a training teacher, conducted the training course of construction machinery full-time training with D; (d) the Plaintiff, a training teacher, conducted the training course of construction machinery full-time training; and (d) conducted the training course of construction machinery full-time training at the same time; and (e) conducted the training course of construction machinery full-time training at the same time, on the ground that two trainees of construction machinery full-time training equipment approved by the Enforcement Rule 1 of the Workers Act.”

2. (5) Pursuant to paragraph (a) (A), the Plaintiff revoked the recognition of the said four processes and a disposition to entrust or restrict the recognition of the relevant one-year course (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2 (including additional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1 to 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1 is inevitable for an instructor E to resign on January 18, 2016, which is the day before the beginning of the training.