1. The defendant's appeal and the plaintiff's incidental appeal are all dismissed.

2. Costs arising from an appeal and an incidental appeal shall be respectively.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.

The phrase, “this case’s request for formal trial by D, currently in progress with the Daegu District Court Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Office 2017 High Court Decision 2017 High Court Decision 346, May 25, 2018 was pronounced not guilty of D on May 25, 2018, and the prosecutor appealed against the above judgment and continues to be in the appellate court as Daegu District Court Branch Office 2018No1992, Daegu District Court Decision 2010, May 2018.” This is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the addition of the written evidence No. 19 and No. 10 to the grounds for recognition, and thus, this is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal and the plaintiff's incidental appeal are dismissed.