logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2018.05.31 2017고합122
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(13세미만미성년자준강간)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (rape-rape of a minor under the age of 13) was the friendship of the victim C (V, 12 years old), where other family members of the defendant's residence located within the house at around September 26, 2015, at around 102 Doo-si D Building D, 102 Dong 302, and around September 26, 2015, the defendant, his father, and the defendant, who was the father, visited the victim at the relative house to keep him in the house, and had the victim at the house, and had the victim her house, and had the victim her house in the same beds because the victim changed his mar, she was able to rape the victim with his her clothes, and her chest her chest she was frighted, and she was flued into the victim's sexual part, and she was inserted into the victim's body.

Accordingly, the defendant has sexual intercourse with a minor who is under 13 years of age by taking advantage of an impossible state of resistance.

2. On October 201 to December 12, 201, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (rape-rape by blood) reported that the victim was locked, and the victim was set off in the room of the above victim C (the 13-year old-age), who is a relative to the Defendant’s residence, as stated in the above paragraph (1) at night, and subsequently inserted the victim’s sexual organ into the part of the victim’s sound, with his/her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s

Accordingly, the defendant has sexual intercourse with the victim by taking advantage of the impossibility of resisting the victim.

3. On August 31, 2017, the Defendant violated the Child Uniforms Act (child abuse) at around 22:30 on August 31, 2017, on the part of the Defendant, on the ground that the said victim (the said victim (the 14-year old-old-old-age-old-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-of-age-age-age-age-of-child-age-age-of-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child relationship)

arrow