logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.11.15 2018고합319
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(친족관계에의한준강간)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant: (a) returned home while under the influence of alcohol, in the name of the Defendant’s dwelling, with the view to the string of a new wall on the day on 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, and (b) was the victim D (here, 14 years old) who is the Defendant’s father.

I think the victim's body is more rhyd against the victim's will, and the victim's body was exceeded, and the defendant's sexual organ was inserted into one time.

Accordingly, the defendant was aware that his blood victim was locked and was in an impossible condition to resist, and sexual intercourse with the victim.

2. A crime committed around October 2017: (a) the Defendant returned home at the residence of the Defendant, who was under the influence of alcohol, on October 2017, and was under the influence of alcohol, and (b) the said victim D (V, 14 years old) was locked.

I think the victim's body is added to the victim's body against the victim's will and added it to the victim's clothes, put the victim's chest into the victim's clothes, and inserted the victim's finger into the sound part of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act by using his knowledge that his blood victim was in a state of impossibility to resist because he was locked by blood victim.

[1] At the time of each of the crimes in this case, the victim was the age of 14 years old at the time of the crime in this case, and 2. The victim, who was under diving immediately before each of the crimes in this case, was broken out by the defendant's act, but did not have any response other than following the defendant's act by suffering from the defendant's act.

(3) In light of the fact that the Defendant attempted to have sexual contact with the victim rapidly and for a considerable shorter period of time, the Defendant committed the instant crime, and (4) in full view of the fact that there is no reason to allow the victim’s sexual contact with the Defendant, the victim’s father and descendant to have sexual contact with the Defendant, following the instant crime.

arrow