logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.07.19 2014구단1763
국가유공자 등록거분처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s decision that rendered against the Plaintiff on December 10, 2013 constituted a non-conformity of the requirements for a person of distinguished service to the State shall be revoked.

2...

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 18, 2002, the Plaintiff (B) entered the Army and received education from the Education Team for the Special Electric Complex Education Team for the Special Electric Complex on Special Cases, and served as a noncommissioned Officer on January 30, 2003, and discharged on January 29, 2007.

B. On May 30, 2013, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that “The Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that it does not constitute a person who has received performance of duties or education and training directly related to the number and security of the State, or the protection of the lives and property of the people, and received an operation of converging signboards escape certificates due to a brue pain, and thereafter, he/she received an operation of converging from the 71st class and 2 local headquarters of the 13th class and the 13th class and the 71st class of the 2nd class of the 13th class of the 13th class of the 13th class of the 13th class of the 13th class of the 13th class of the 2013.” However, the part of the 4th class of the 4-5th class of the 2nd class of the 2nd class of the 3th class of the military.

(C) The disposition of this case is called the "disposition of this case"

(c) On February 27, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal against it, but the Central Administrative Appeals Commission dismissed the decision on July 8, 2014 (the Central Administrative Appeals Commission) (the fact that there is no ground for recognition, the entries in Gap's evidence 1 through 5, Eul's evidence 1, and the purport of the entire pleadings).

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. From October 21, 2002, the Plaintiff asserted as a C Special Education and Training Member, while taking a training course for the A Special Education and Training Center for the A Special Education and Training Center from October 21, 2002, the Plaintiff got a serious shock and was under physical treatment at his/her own stage, and was under training, and continued to undergo the education and training after being placed for his/her own.

arrow