logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.08.16 2017고단4022
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at the Incheon District Court on March 18, 2013, issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Incheon District Court, and on October 30, 2013, issued a summary order of KRW 6 million for the same crime at the same court on two or more occasions. However, on April 23:23, 2017, the Defendant driven B vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of KRW 0.066% while driving the vehicle under the influence of alcohol at around 0.06%, while driving the vehicle under the influence of alcohol in the influence of alcohol at around 0.06%, from the front day of the X-gu Incheon District Court to the road of the Cheongra Women's Hospital located in the same Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seo-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions: References to inquiries, investigation reports (Attachment of previous convictions and summary orders), and copies of summary orders attached thereto;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, even though the Defendant had the record of a single kind of crime at several times, was under the influence of driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, and the nature of the crime was less and less, but the driving distance was shorter and the amount of alcohol concentration in blood was relatively lower, the fact that the Defendant did not go against other traffic-related Acts and subordinate statutes, the fact that he did not go back to violate other traffic-related Acts and subordinate statutes, the fact that his mistake is too late, and all other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, family relationship, etc., are considered to be determined as above.

arrow