logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.07.19 2017고단2372
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 27, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of a fine of KRW 700,000 for a crime of violating road traffic law (drinking driving) in the support of the Mangwon method and the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 4 million for the same crime at the Incheon District Court on February 20, 2014.

Although the Defendant violated Article 44(1)(d) of the Road Traffic Act twice, on March 19, 2017, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.071% in blood around 15:13 on March 19, 2017, the Defendant driven B rocketing car and proceeded with approximately 8 km from the 15 Cheongsopha Spex road to the road front of the 4 calendar area in Bupyeong-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions: References to inquiries, investigation reports (reports attached to the summary order of the same kind of power), and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes attached thereto;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act, even though the Defendant had the record of two identical kinds of crimes, was in driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, and thus, the nature of the crime was relatively low. However, the amount of alcohol content in blood was relatively low, the violation of other traffic-related Acts and subordinate statutes, the late and late mar his mistake is divided, and all other circumstances constituting the condition for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, etc., are considered to be determined as above.

arrow