logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.05.01 2014나6044
노임
Text

1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) On July 22, 2008, the Plaintiff entered into a labor contract with the Defendant and took charge of the guard duty for 24 hours in the B apartment located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government. Article 2 (Place and Contents of Work) (1) Work Place: B apartment management office: Article 3 (Retirement Pay) of the Standard for Calculation of Reduction of Minimum Wage Amount of Security Service (24 hours of Work) Article 3 (Retirement Pay) of the Standard for Calculation of Reduction of Minimum Wage Amount of 24 hours of Work: The amount equivalent to one-month wage shall be paid to the person who has worked for one year. Article 6 (Work Hours and Hours) (1) The beginning and closing time (including recess hours) shall be from the start to the end of the business.

(A) 2 Recess hours are from 1:0 p.m. to 4:0 a.m. (3) meal hours: from 1:0 p.m. to 4:0 a.m.:0 p.m., 6:30 p.m., 12:00 p.m., 13:00 p.m., 19:00 p.m., 19:00 p.m. to 20:00 p.m., and 20:0 p.m. to d.m., other TV than break hours

Article 8 (Period of Contract) 1) - July 22, 2008 - July 21, 2009 (12 months) The plaintiff and D (the chairperson of the defendant at that time) shall notify whether to renew the contract one month prior to the expiration of the contract.

Provided, That if there is no notification to the other party one month prior to such notification, this contract shall be deemed to have been automatically extended for one year.

2) On June 19, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a labor contract with the Defendant with the same terms and conditions as the contract period from July 22, 2009 to July 21, 2010. 3) on June 28, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into the same labor contract with the Defendant for the same terms and conditions as the contract period from July 22, 2010 to July 21, 201. However, the Plaintiff’s labor contract with the Defendant for the same terms and conditions as the contract period from July 22, 2010 to July 21, 201 (Evidence 1-3) of the above labor contract (Evidence 1-3 of the above labor contract), but the hours of non-working hours and the hours of non-working and the

(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant employment contracts”) 4 The Defendant refers to working hours, recess, and holidays as stipulated in Chapters IV and V of the Labor Standards Act for security guards including the Plaintiff from the Minister of Employment and Labor.

arrow