The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant did not commit a larceny during the period of parole, such as No. 1 of the Attached List of Crimes.

Nevertheless, the court below erred by misapprehending the fact that the defendant committed the larceny No. 1 of the crime committed against the defendant (hereinafter "the crime No. 1 of this case").

B. In light of the overall circumstances of the instant case of unfair sentencing, the sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant admitted the first crime of this case at an investigative agency and the lower court’s trial to acknowledge the first crime of this case, and denies its statement. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly examined and adopted by the lower court and the Defendant’s legal statement at the time when the police investigation was conducted: (i) although the Defendant partially denied facts of other crimes at the time of the police investigation, the Defendant made a statement that recognized all of the facts of the first crime of this case (293 pages of the evidence records); (ii) recognized the first crime of this case as consistent from the police investigation to the lower court (204, 309 pages of the evidence records); (iii) at the time of on-site inspection, the location where the first crime of this case was committed (236 pages of the evidence records); and (iv) the Defendant committed the crime of this case by selling stolen goods acquired through the Internet and receiving the proceeds therefrom through the Defendant’s account (201 pages of the evidence records); and (iv) considering that the Defendant’s deposit from the Defendant’s account at the lower court to KRW 15450,050,00,000,00.