Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the chief director of “C”, an incorporated association, who carries out cultural projects for the residents of the five North Korean Dos.

A person who intends to provide food entertainment services shall report to the Minister of Food and Drug Safety or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu/Gu, the branch office of the Special Self-Governing Province or the head of a business establishment, as prescribed by Presidential Decree

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without going through the above reporting procedures with the competent authority from June 18, 2016 to June 26, 2016, equipped with cooking facilities, such as air conditioning, water supply, gas, cooking, bec, and kitchen facilities, and kitchen equipment, etc., from the 40-dong (mar 5 x 5 x 5 mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar , etc. to customers customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and I;

1. A written statement of the business owner of J;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on reports on criminal place and unreported business site photographs;

1. Article 97 of the relevant Act on criminal facts and subparagraph 1 of Article 97 of the Food Sanitation Act, and Article 37 (4) of the same Act on the selective punishment (Selection of a punishment);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel is located in the president of an incorporated association, and the Defendant overall control over the instant event. However, since the Defendant’s act of operating a restaurant in the event of this case was directed to H, the principal agent who operated a general restaurant without reporting to the competent administrative agency as stated in the facts charged of this case is not the Defendant, but the principal agent who operated a general restaurant.