The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, due to the summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. Determination: (a) the Defendant made a statement that he/she made a confession of each of the crimes of this case and against his/her mistake; (b) the Defendant repaid the amount of damage to one of the victims; and (c) the said victim expressed his/her intention that he/she does not want to punish the victims; (c) on the other hand, each of the crimes of this case is bad in terms of the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime repeatedly for a considerable period of time against many victims, since he/she did not know about the fact that the Defendant had been arrested as a flagrant offender on November 4, 2013 and was arrested as a flagrant offender on seven occasions before the following day, and was arrested as a flagrant offender on July 9, 2013; (d) there were two times the same history of the Defendant; and (e) the Defendant was punished for suspension of the execution of sentence on this paper; (e) the Defendant did not endeavor to recover damage to 10 other victims; and (e) there were no circumstances, motive, motive, and motive of the instant crime, and circumstances.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.