The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) shall be excessively unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below was led to the confession and rebuttal of the defendant, the defendant agreed with the victims of the crime of interference with business, and the defendant deposited KRW 1 million for the police officers who are the victims of the crime of insult, and the defendant was faced with an unknown labing collapse. However, each of the crimes of this case is that the defendant interfered with the duties of the victims and insulting the police officers who called out after receiving reports on two occasions, and the case is not somewhat weak, and the defendant has been punished several times for the crime of violence or obstruction of performance of official duties in the past. In particular, each of the crimes of this case was committed again during the suspension of execution due to the crime of injury in the past, even though the defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender of the crime of interference with business in the judgment of the court below, and again committed the crime of interference with business in the first B of the judgment of the court below immediately after being arrested as a flagrant offender of the crime of interference with business in the judgment of the court below, and there is no special reason to change the sentencing after the sentence was sentenced.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.