A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the director of “D” who sells lectures related to Chinese characters and teaching materials for Chinese characters in Chungcheong City C.

1. Around August 16, 2012, the Defendant stated that “The Victim E shall purchase KRW 200,000,000,000,000,000,000 won in September 27, 2012,” from the H reporter of the magazine “E (representative G)”, the victim of the 13th floor of the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F building 13th 8, and said that “The Defendant would purchase KRW 400,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0

However, the Defendant had operated D as the enemy without any particular property or income from December 2003. The Defendant had no intention or ability to pay the price even if he was provided with the foregoing book, under the vague expectation that if the article was published in the said magazine without any particular property or income, the number of students who heard one’s lecture will increase and that profits would result in the increase of the number of students.

Nevertheless, the Defendant deceiving the victim as above, and then acquired 400 copies from September 2012, 500,000 won at the market price, which was obtained from the victim.

2. On October 26, 2012, the criminal defendant against the victim I made a false statement to L, who is an employee of the victim I (representative K) in the office of the victim I (representative K) located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, stating that “I would pay KRW 20 million for publication of the cost of the Certotototle (4P) published in November 2012 and KRW 500,000 for the cost of publication of the Certotle news article in the high seas, and KRW 7.5 million for the monthly purchase price of KRW 5 million.”

However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the cost of publishing the article and the cost of purchasing the article for a monthly period, on the ground that the Defendant was unable to pay the purchase price for the book with the “E” as stated in the foregoing Paragraph 1. and the same paragraph.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.