The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the operator or the president of D, who sells the lectures related to Chinese medicine and the teaching materials of Chinese medicine, in Chungcheong City.

Around August 16, 2012, the criminal defendant against the victim E told the H reporter of the “E (Representative G)” of the magazine “E (Representative G)”, the victim of the 13th floor of the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Jongno-gu 13th class 8, stating that the defendant would purchase 200 copies of the E magazine No. 200 won in September 2012 in which the internal article is published, and again said that he would purchase H reporter at a price lower than 5 million won in the unit price.”

However, the Defendant had operated D as the enemy without any particular property or income from December 2003. The Defendant had no intention or ability to pay the price even if he was provided with the foregoing book, under the vague expectation that if the article was published in the said magazine without any particular property or income, the number of students who heard one’s lecture will increase and that profits would result in the increase of the number of students.

Nevertheless, the Defendant deceiving the victim as above and acquired 400 copies from September, 2012, which amount to five million won market value by deceiving the victim.

B. On October 26, 2012, the criminal defendant against the victim I made a false statement to L, who is an employee of the victim I (representative K) in the office of "I" located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, that "I will pay 20 million won for publication of the Certotototle (4P) article and 500 won for the monthly 20 million won for publication of the Certotle article in the high seas, and 7.5 million won for the monthly 5 million purchase price."

However, the defendant above A.

The reasons mentioned in the same paragraph and the situation where the contract price for the purchase of a book with the E is not paid, so there was no intention or ability to pay the price for publication of the article and the purchase price for a monthly period.

Nevertheless, the defendant is above.