1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff as to the defendant B, which constitutes the following amount of payment order:

1. Claim against the defendant B

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff received an order from the Defendant B, who operates the clothing manufacturing company “E”, and processed the clothing and supplied it to the Defendant B, as indicated below, and paid 676,800 won for self-denunciation and 770,000 won for Washington.

The Plaintiff received only the above 385 KK 28,000 16,493,400 2 G 66726,000 G 667,200 19,076,200 3365 I 4,666,000 17,666,000 J 376 J 42,000 17,376 42,000 17,371,200 385 K 28,000 11,858,000 106,568,000 28,000 108,000 108,000 108,208,000 108,208,000 20

Therefore, Defendant B is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 25,975,720 (=108,014,800 - 82,039,080).

B. According to the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 2 through 7 (including paper numbers), and Gap evidence Nos. 15 and the whole pleadings, it can be acknowledged that the plaintiff processed the clothing with the order given as follows and supplied it to defendant B. Thus, unless there are special circumstances, defendant B is liable to pay to the plaintiff KRW 102,781,80, barring special circumstances.

The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff supplied the above 327 K 385 K 28,000 15,107,400 26,00 G 600 26,160,000 3 H 498 4,000 44,182,000 17,182,00 J 376 42,000 J 376 42,000 17,371,205 K 385 28,000 11,858,781,780 2 G 600 357 357 67 6635 67 6536 67

B. On the other hand, Defendant B’s unit price stated in the manufacturing instruction is the unit price ordered by Defendant B, the prime contractor L, and the Plaintiff.