A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

On December 8, 2013, at around 12:00, the Defendant: (a) discovered and parked in the vicinity of the C parking lot located in Yong-gun, Young-gun; (b) used the kikikiki, which was in the custody of the victim D (year 47) who was parked there; (c) 500,000,00 the market price of E 125,000,000, Hakiba, which was in the possession of the victim D (year 47).

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in this Court that "it is true that he has loaded a cat around the F elementary school, which he was parked in a catus cat around the F elementary school, with a catus catus suffering from a catus."

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Records of police seizure and list of seizure;

1. Investigation report (the case accompanied by a photograph of otobiopia), three photographs, and investigation report (the case accompanied by a detailed statement on the obiopia);

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the investigation report (cases accompanied by a written estimate);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment (the defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime on two occasions, and one of them is punished by imprisonment, so that the defendant has been punished by imprisonment, making a choice of imprisonment);

1. The decision as to the defendant's assertion under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the main part of the crime committed by the defendant is recognized, the price of stolen and stolen Orala is relatively small, and the owner of Orala is recovered (see the statement of victim), etc.)

1. The summary of the argument is the fact that the defendant walked the Dong-dong on this case, but the defendant is driving on the idea that he wants to see Orala once, but it does not bring about a theft idea.

2. The following circumstances that can be acknowledged by the instant evidence, ① the Defendant gets on and off the off the off part without any indication or notification with the owner of the Ethtob (hereinafter “the instant Oba”), and ② the Defendant gets on driving the off part of the instant Oba from around December 12:00 on December 8, 2013.