logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.04.12 2017고단660
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 24, 2017, the Defendant paid a taxi fee to a taxi driver after receiving a report from 112 that “no taxi passenger will pay a taxi fee” in front of the Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, by receiving a report from 112, and receiving a recommendation from E and policeman F to return to the taxi driver, and then walking on the patrol vehicle.

Does he display his identification card anywhere anywhere at his age.

“The Si expenses refer to “the upper part of the patrole F one time with the right drinking of the upper part of the patrole.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of Fman on patrol duty, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. Application of the investigation report (in the course of the investigation of on-site CCTV confirmation and the attachment of screen image data), and the Acts and subordinate statutes to capture screen photographs attached thereto;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. The sentencing criteria shall not be applied as a fine is selected for the crime in the judgment.

2. The defendant shall be sentenced to a fine as ordered in consideration of the fact that the criminal liability for the crime of this case in which the defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by a police officer who was dispatched upon receiving a report on him/her is not easy, but the defendant's mistake and reflects against him/her, and only the fact that the defendant has been sentenced one time to a fine due to a violent crime in light of light of the fact

arrow