logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.01.12 2016고단7603
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 28, 2016, at the front of the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, the Defendant interfered with his/her duties: (a) was requested by the injured party C to pay the taxi fee from the injured party when he/she gets on a D taxi operated by the injured party C at the front of the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon; and (b) was requested by the injured party to pay the taxi fee from the injured party to the 3rd Dong Dong-gu, Incheon; (c)

No money may be paid.

“The police officers (referring to the police officers)” and “I am going to move to the House of B,” and the police officers were forced to interfere with the victim’s affairs concerning the taxi business by force by avoiding disturbance for about 30 minutes, such as refusing to leave the taxi.”

2. On April 28, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, as described in paragraph 1, at the front of the Incheon Bupyeong-gu 3 Dong community service center, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon around 02:30, the Defendant was urged by the police officer F of the Incheon Bupyeong Police Station E box sent to the site upon the request of the above C to help him, and was urged by the police officer F of the Incheon Bupyeong Police Station E box sent to the site, to leave the taxi and to return home, and the Defendant was f to the said F, as described in paragraph 1.

. Chewing farch farch farp. farch farp. farp.” and “parp farp farp reduction.”

Scar family members will die.

In doing the bath theory, “,” etc., assaulted the above F’s left shoulder part of the shoulder and the breast part of the said F’s work, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties in relation to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of the crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement with respect to C and F;

1. A written statement of C and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 314 of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), respectively (the choice of imprisonment and imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (amended by the Presidential Decree No. 1060, Jan. 1, 2001) (hereinafter “The following sentence grounds”)

arrow