A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported a visit to the Goyang Police Station E District located in Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu; (b) paid taxi expenses in return for the payment of taxi expenses; and (c) committed assault, such as “I ambling off the fat fat fat fat fat fat,” and “I amb off the fat fat fat fat fat fat fat,” and “I amb above the fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fats.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order and the prevention of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act in the suspended sentence shows that the defendant has a strong penance from the beginning of the investigation, and that he does not repeat again.

In full view of all the factors such as the details of the instant crime, the background leading up to the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, occupation and career, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, the details of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment shall be determined as ordered.