The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for four months) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The extent of damage caused by the Defendant’s instant crime is not so significant, and there is a favorable circumstance to consider the Defendant’s act in favor of the investigative agency, the lower court, and the court of first instance, such as the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime in this case during the period of repeated crime, and did not recover damage up to the trial. There were several records of punishment due to the same crime, assaulting victims without any special reason, and the nature of the crime is bad. The lower court’s sentencing seems to take into account all favorable circumstances, and there is no change of circumstances that may differ from the lower court’s punishment; the Defendant’s age, character, character and environment, occupation, power, process of the instant crime, means and consequence of the instant crime, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.