1. The plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) On July 1, 2005, the residents who have promoted the housing redevelopment project in the E group at the time of Pakistan established the Housing Redevelopment Complex Development Meeting around July 1, 2005, the committee for promotion of housing redevelopment project in the zone A (tentative name), and Defendant B was appointed as the chairperson. 2) The committee for promotion of this case was established on April 7, 2006 with Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) to promote the housing redevelopment project (hereinafter “instant rearrangement project”) in the E group at the time of Pakistan, the committee for promotion of this case’s housing redevelopment project (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) signed a housing redevelopment project (tentative name) with the Defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”), prepared a plan necessary for the project approval, design and construction report necessary for the commencement of the project, prepared the plan necessary for the project, ③ support of the completion of the construction of the project, and calculated the amount of the building area to be preserved by 300/60/300 of the building area and the construction area of the project.

3) On May 2, 2006, the instant promotion committee paid KRW 261,968,000, which is 10% of the service amount, to the Defendant Company as the primary payment as stipulated in the instant provisional contract. (B) The instant promotion committee concluded the instant provisional contract. After entering into the instant provisional contract, the instant promotion committee increased the size, etc. subject to the instant improvement project (i) from 95,475,00 square meters to 132,918 square meters, and the anticipated total floor area is 247,432.52 square meters to 247,432.52 square meters (74,846.47 square meters) to 326,766.67 square meters (98,846.47 square meters). The instant promotion committee reflected the reasons for the instant design change between the Defendant Company and the Defendant Company on August 2, 2007, and the instant design service cost promotion committee and the Defendant.