logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.07.03 2014고단292 (1)
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 292"

1. The Defendant and C, as an ex post facto worship of society, had a large amount of money for a wedding hall and a large amount of money for a wedding hall is mixed, and under the initiative of C with a history of theft of a wedding hall, the Defendant reported the network around his surroundings, and C conspired to steal it with a method of cutting down with a stable embankment.

The Defendant and C around 12:49 on February 16, 2014, around 12:49, within the first floor F holes of E-type E-type E-type D located in the front of the relevant wedding hall, and the victim G left a family photograph by setting a stable in the front of the relevant wedding hall, and the Defendant set up a trial line to cover the above bank with the co-art in his/her home at the same time so that the victim cannot see the bank, at the same time, at the same time, the victim cannot see the bank, and C gets into the front side of the above bank, and as such, she saw the above bank as a cover with the co-owner at the above time.

As a result, the Defendant, in collaboration with C, stolen a galthopt 2 cellular phone which is the market price of the victim H owned by the victim, which is the fraud of the victim in this area, with C, in which KRW 17.6 million is included in cash owned by the victim.

"2015 Highest 771"

2. On December 21, 2013, at around 16:04, the Defendant and C confirmed that the Victim K had completed the receipt of a axis for marriage at the J-type Scam Scam located in Busan, Busan, and then, the Defendant and C confirmed under the family seat table in front of the aforesaid Scambling Hall with a cover of KRW 11 million and a cover of KRW 1,00,000 and KRW 1,000,000 and KRW 1,000,000 under the family seat table. After reporting the network at the entrance of the Defendant, the Defendant reported the said a cover at the entrance of the entrance, covered the said a cover of the Plaintiff left with his own name, thereby leaving the said a cover.

As a result, the defendant and C stolen the property owned by the victim jointly.

Summary of Evidence

[2014 Highest 292]

1. Statement of Co-defendant C and the defendant in the first trial record;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Investigation Report (ctv) 1.

arrow