A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] The Defendant, at the Daegu District Court on April 13, 2012, is a person who drives drinking at least twice after having received a summary order of a fine of three million won for a crime of violating road traffic law, and on August 22, 2014, by having received a summary order of a fine of 1.5 million won from the same court as the same crime.

[Criminal facts] On August 21, 2017, the Defendant driven BM5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.067% alcohol content from approximately 3km section from the 3km away from the rogate in the Nam-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, to the rode distance in the same city Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, investigation report, and summary order-making statute, such as criminal history;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (or choice of imprisonment);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include the frequency and time when the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, the concentration of alcohol in blood at the time of driving the drinking of this case, the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., as stated in the arguments of this case, shall be determined as ordered by considering the various factors for sentencing as stated in the argument of this case.