The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the following circumstances, the court below denied the credibility of the victim’s statement, which is direct evidence of the facts charged of this case, and acquitted the defendant and the requester for an attachment order (hereinafter “defendant”). The court below erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

① The victim showed a certain passive and passive attitude in the process of identifying the offender is merely a minor part, and considering that the statement was made at the time three years have elapsed since the date of damage, the credibility of the victim’s statement cannot be rejected on this ground.

② 범인식별 절차 과정에서 피해자는 10명의 화상 자료를 확인하다가 1∽7 번째 용의자에 대해서는 페이지를 넘기는 식으로 훑어보았는데 8 번째 용의 자인 피고인의 화상 자료를 보고는 눈을 떼지 못하다가 눈물을 흘렸고, 자신의 모에게 자신을 성폭행한 범인이 분명 하다고 말하였다.

(3) There was a defect in the criminal identification procedure.

Even if there was no room for intervention by the investigative agency, and there was no other proviso on the identity of the offender as well as the appearance of the offender, so there was little possibility of distorted statements.

④ 피해자는 범인이 메고 있었다는 가방을 확인할 당시 모양과 색상이 유사한 가방 13개가 제시되었는데 1∽7 번째 가방은 대충 보며 지나가다가 8 번째 가방 앞에 그대로 멈추고 1분 정도 쳐다보았고 이후 마지막 13 번째 가방까지 확인하다가 12 번째 가방을 잠시 쳐다보았으며 이후 8 번째 가방과 12 번째 가방을 집중적으로 살펴본 후 이 두 개의 가방을 선택하였는데, 8 번째 가방은 피고인의 집에 있던 가방이었다.

2. The court below, however, has made a statement by the injured person who classified the defendant as the criminal in the court of original judgment and the police, but the court below is legitimate.