logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.08.30 2016고정182
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant and C are passengers of the KTX train that runs from the Busan Station to the Seoul Station.

On August 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) put 20:15 places in the above KTX train C (the 50-year old-old 50-year old-old lavers into the mouth, and (b) put the train crew of the Defendant who was seated subsequent to the above C into the mouth, and made the train crew of the train into the mouth, and made the train crew of the said lavers into the mouth, and made the train crew of the said lavers, and the said lavers lavers lavers lavers laves lavers lavers lavers laves lavers laves lavers laves laves laves laves laves laves laves laves laves laves laves laves laves laves laves laves laves laves.

At the above date, at the same time and place, the victim C was injured by the Defendant’s knife with the Defendant’s bomb, thereby making the victim’s knife with the Defendant’s knife, and the victim was injured by the Defendant’s knife of the knife part of the knife, which requires medical treatment for about thirty

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness C and D;

1. The video CD of the case;

1. A medical certificate (the defendant had a knife of the victim as stated in the facts of the crime in the judgment, but the victim argued that his knife was made at the level of defense against the defendant by taking bomb, and thus the defense of a political party is established. However, considering the method of exercising the defendant's tangible power, the degree of injury inflicted upon the victim, etc. recognized by each evidence in the judgment, the defendant's act is not merely a passive defense against the victim's unfair attack, but also has the nature of the act of attack against the victim. Thus, it cannot be viewed that it constitutes a legitimate defense

arrow