The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable because of the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (4 months of imprisonment).

2. There is no circumstance to consider the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, such as that the Defendant recognized the instant crime, that the Defendant committed any contingent crime under the influence of alcohol, and that the Defendant plans or fails to prepare specific acts corresponding to the content of such remarks.

However, intimidation that causes explosion using gas in the people's residential area may seriously threaten the public safety, causing enormous interference with the execution of public duties and the mobilization of fire-fighting personnel, and there is a significant degree of interference with the execution of public duties. The Defendant's above assertion is without merit, in consideration of the following factors: (a) the Defendant's age, sex, family environment, specific circumstances of the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime; and (b) all of the sentencing conditions as indicated in the records and changes of the instant case, such as the Defendant's age, sex, family environment, details of the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.