The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable because of the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (six months of imprisonment).

2. The judgment that the Defendant recognized the instant crime, that some of the victims did not want to punish the Defendant, and that most of the damaged goods were returned to the victims, and that the damage caused by each of the instant crimes is relatively minor, etc. do not have any favorable condition for the Defendant.

However, even though the defendant was subject to criminal punishment on several occasions for the same kind of crime, it is highly likely that the defendant will be subject to punishment again for each of the crimes of this case at the expiration of 13 days from the date of the completion of the sentence due to the same kind of crime. In addition, considering the defendant's age, sex, criminal conduct, family environment, health condition, specific circumstances of the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime, all of the sentencing conditions specified in the records of this case and the theory of changes, such as the defendant's age, sex, family environment, health condition, specific circumstances of the crime, etc., the court below's sentence against the defendant is too unreasonable, so the above argument

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.