logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.10.20 2015고단5704
무고교사
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The gist of the facts charged was that the Defendant, while investing in real estate jointly with the victim C (hereinafter “victim”) and having caused a dispute, tried to compel D to arrest the victim by threatening the victim or threatening to make a false accusation by intimidation.

On January 2014, the Defendant told D at the Defendant’s house located in Daegu Northern-gu E, 106, and 3905, that “The victim told D to the effect that “The victim would be punished as an accomplice in a crime of fraud, by taking into account the following facts: “The victim would be able to go away.” The victim toldd that “the victim would go back to a school, to a frightt, and to a frightt,” and that “the female employees would go off from a mobile timbering house in which the F would go, and fright to do so.” As the victim tolds that “the victim would go off from a large number of female employees from a mobile timbering house in which the F would go,” it is difficult to detain the victim by intimidation and defamation, and it would be punished as an accomplice in a crime of fraud without filing a complaint.”

On January 15, 2014, D submitted a false complaint to the public service center of the Cheongdo Police Station located in the Cheongdo-Eup, Cheongdo-si, Cheongdo-si, Cheongdo-si, despite the fact that the victim threatened D or defames D for the purpose of having the victim subject to criminal punishment, D submitted a false complaint against the victim.

Around January 14, 2014, the Defendant and D made a statement at the H administrative office located in Daegu-gu G, Daegu-gu, and its contents were “The Defendant killed the complainant as to why 10% of the I forest land in the Cheongbuk-do, Cheongbuk-do, which was made in the shape of a conspiracy for the introduction of a letter.” The Defendant told the complainant as follows: “I am am at school, and I am am am am amb off.” “I am am ambat at school. I am am am ambat at school,” and “I am am ambas to why I am the forest development cost is 120,000 won per square day.” The wife and mother of the complainant as “I am am from the mobile-type housing in which F.m., I am in the future.”

arrow