1. Defendant CFB Co., Ltd.: (a) KRW 122,046,463 and its amount from September 27, 2017 to November 22, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. A. On May 21, 2009, the Plaintiff and Defendant CFB entered into a construction contract with respect to the construction of 2 equipment for solar power generation systems on the surface of the 474-3 surface of the Myeongchodo 270-1 and the Myeongdo 474-3, the Myeongdo Dogdo 474-3, respectively, with respect to the construction work cost of KRW 1.28 billion (excluding value-added tax), the construction period from May 25, 2009 to August 20, 2009, with the permission for solar power generation projects, the installation and distribution of connection boxes, the installation and distribution of rabter, the installation and distribution of solar power plants, and the installation of solar power generation facilities and installation of solar power plants, such as solar assembly and distribution, as indicated in a written estimate, under the so-called “instant construction contract” (hereinafter the “instant construction contract”).

2) At the time of the conclusion of the contract, the Plaintiff and Defendant CB agreed to use the sPR-300-WHT-1 CK, which was manufactured by SPR-300-WHT-1 C, and hereinafter referred to as “instant racks”).

B. On February 2, 2009, the Plaintiff and the instant construction contract had been discussed on the purchase of the cap, and discussed the purchase price, payment, loading, etc. of the cap through the Defendant Sshacker. (2) Defendant Sshacker concluded a purchase agreement with Defendant Sshacker Co., Ltd. on April 28, 2009 with respect to the instant cap.

C. 1) The completion of the construction work by Defendant Dab had completed the construction work of solar power plants under the instant contract on August 20, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as the “instant electric power plants”) and the power plants installed at the 474-3 of the vibration 474-3 are “the instant two power plants.”

(2) A total of 660 rings (330 rings per power plant) were installed at each of the instant power plants. D.

The power plant of this case has a difference in the volume of power generation compared to the power plant of this case immediately adjacent to the two power plant of this case.