logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.09.04 2018가합41429
부동산 인도 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendants shall deliver each of the pertinent real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a party’s position 1) The project implementation district (hereinafter “instant project district”) with the business area of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government W 32,075m2.5m2

) Housing reconstruction rearrangement project to be implemented (hereinafter “instant reconstruction project”).

The Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter referred to as the “Urban Improvement Act”).

The head of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the "head of Eunpyeong-gu") on January 23, 2008, as a housing reconstruction and consolidation project association established pursuant to the Housing Rebuilding and Improvement Project Association.

(2) The Defendants are owners of each of the pertinent real estate (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) indicated in the separate sheet in the instant project area, with the authorization to establish an association on March 13, 2009.

B. 1) On May 28, 2009, the Plaintiff was authorized to implement the instant reconstruction project by the head of Eunpyeong-gu, the head of Eunpyeong-gu, to obtain authorization for the implementation of the said reconstruction project. On November 20, 2009, the Plaintiff publicly announced the application period for parcelling-out to the association members by setting the period of application for parcelling-out from the same date to January 13, 2010 from the same date. 2) On July 14, 2011, the Plaintiff announced the application period for parcelling-out to the association members from August 4, 2011 to September 5, 201, and on March 7, 2013, 201, after obtaining an approval for the implementation of the project again from the head of Pyeongtaek-gu to the date of March 26, 2013 to the date of May 3, 2013, the Plaintiff extended the period of application for parcelling-out to the period of application for parcelling-out.

hereinafter referred to as "third application period for parcelling-out"

(3) The Defendants filed an application for parcelling-out within a specified period for the application for parcelling-out, but expressed to the Plaintiff the intent to withdraw the application for parcelling-out between December 2, 2013 and June 2016, when the period for application for parcelling-out expires.

4. On November 10, 2015, the head of Eunpyeong-gu, the competent authority, authorized the management and disposal plan under the instant reconstruction project, and announced it on November 12, 2015, and approved the amendment of the management and disposal plan on May 4, 2018.

arrow