logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.03.27 2017고단1168
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 19, 2017, from around 15:35, to around 15:48, 15:48, the Defendant: (a) reported that there was a tension in the atmosphere of the Victim C management in Chuncheon-si; and (b) demanded that the employees be in charge of the calculation at the place subsequent to the request for the statement of accounts; (c) however, the Defendant asked the Defendant to make a statement that he would return to the calculation; (d) the Defendant made a statement that he would return to the calculation; and (e) as the Defendant’s statement that he would be large, the Defendant would have to grow up and that he would have taken down, and that the satis shall be discarded.

The term "domination in large sound so as to prevent customers who had entered the mat by avoiding disturbance, such as noise, from entering the mat, thereby obstructing the victim's store business by force for about 13 minutes.

2. Around October 14, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s left-hand walk by hearing the horses from the victim’s G (18 years old) to “F convenience store” located in Chuncheon-si E (18 years old) and then making an assault on the victim’s left-hand walk of drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Details of each of the statements made by witnesses C and G in the second public trial records;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each field photograph, a visual photograph and a capse photograph;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act and Articles 314(1) and 260(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which are not much emphasis on the degree of damage and the degree of assault due to interference with the reasons for sentencing.

The victim of the crime of interference with business was expressed not to want the punishment of the defendant.

In light of the circumstances leading up to this case, the circumstances leading up to the crime of insult against police officers immediately after the crime committed on September 19, 2017, as indicated in the judgment, including the punishment of a fine (10 million won), the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, health conditions (combined proof), the means and results of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.

arrow