logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.05.22 2012고단1221
사기
Text

The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months and imprisonment for not more than two months for the crimes of No. 5 of the decision.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 28, 2011, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a period of six months for fraud in the Daejeon District Court's Incheon Branch Branch of the same year.

2.8. The person for whom the judgment has become final and conclusive is the representative of limited partnership C;

1. Fact means that the defendant was merely to take charge of Pyeongtaek-si E civil engineering work in the same workplace with D and did not have the authority to independently sub-subcontract the above civil engineering work, and on the contrary, the defendant was not delegated by D, and therefore, the victim F was unable to have the intent and ability to subcontract the civil engineering work to the owner of the building or the victim F. The defendant's office located in Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on June 2009 would allow the victim to undertake the new construction of Pyeongtaek-si from June 30, 2009 on the ground that "the victim would be able to undertake the new construction of Pyeongtaek-si from June 30, 2009 on the face of 5 million won." The victim acquired the total amount of KRW 3 million on June 25, 2009 and KRW 200 million on June 29 of the same month from the victim to the account under C under the name of contract deposit.

2. In fact, although the victim did not have the intent or ability to cause the victim to work even if he did not receive the money from the victim F because of the lack of capacity to take over H company, the victim received the sum of KRW 15 million,00,000,000,000,000 from the victim to the account in the name of H company C in the name of the acquisition fund of the H company at the office of the defendant in the office of the defendant in the Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City on July 2009, the victim acquired the H company by acquiring the 15,00,000,000 won from the victim.

3. The facts are as set out in Paragraph 2. of the above, even if the victim’sJ was unable to accept money from the HA because it was not capable of taking over the said HA, the victim did not have the intent or ability to take over the said construction, but at the L office of the victim’s J operation on September 2009, located on the fourth floor of the Sinwon-si K Building in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si. The victim’s “Woo-do”

arrow