logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.10.02 2019고단3114
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of thirty million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 22, 2019, from around 03:20 to around 03:33 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol at the D cafeteria managed by the victim C in Daegu Suwon-gu B, the Defendant took a bath to his employees with the larger sound called “this Chewing gue”; (b) was placed on the floor of the restaurant; (c) was placed on the part of the station; (d) was placed on the site of the station; and (d) the police officer dispatched upon receipt of a report recommended his/her return home, the Defendant drawing the chair of the chairs in the restaurant, and prevented his/her employees from entering the restaurant, and entering the restaurant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. The Defendant, upon receiving a report at the same time and place as the preceding paragraph, proposed that F of the Daegu Suwon Police Station E District Unit, who was called up, shall return home, and deemed the chair in the restaurant as his hand and expressed his bath as “the Chewing gue”, and assaulted F’s face on the face.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of police officers' lives, bodies and property, prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

3. From March 22, 2019 to 04:20 on March 22, 2019 to 04:20 on the same day, the Defendant expressed that the police officer who spits spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit sat sat sat sat sat sat, sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat

As a result, the defendant committed an act of disturbance at the government office under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement against F and C;

1. The E-district work site;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business and the choice of imprisonment) for the crime;

arrow