The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Although the Defendant appealed on the ground that the lower court’s punishment (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, the Defendant had the record of having been sentenced several times due to the same thief crimes, and in particular, in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments, including the fact that the stolen victim was returned to the victim and the Defendant’s health condition, even if considering the fact that the stolen victim was returned, the sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant for the reasons stated in its reasoning is too unreasonable.

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the part of "one year and two years" in the last sentence of the first written judgment of the court below shall be corrected to "one year and two months" ex officio.