The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

In light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments of this case, including the fact that the court below's punishment (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, although the defendant appealeds on the ground that it is too unreasonable, the defendant committed a crime repeatedly in a short period, there are many same criminal records of the defendant, the defendant repeats the crime without being aware of even though he was committed a repeated crime, and the damage caused by each of the crimes of this case was most not recovered, the defendant reached an agreement with the victim M and the victim Z, and even considering the defendant's health condition and family relationship, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable on the ground as stated in its reasoning.

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, “In fact,” in Part 13 of the second sentence of the judgment of the court below, “in fact,” “in fact,” in Part 9 of the judgment of the court below, “B. Fraud and Violation of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act” in Part 3 of the judgment of the court below as “2. Fraudulent and Specialized Credit Finance Business Act”, and “AD” in Part 5-9 of the judgment of the court below as “AD main office” and “Specialized Credit Finance Business Act” in Part 6-9 of the judgment of the court below as “AD main