A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 3, 2017, at around 00:15, the Defendant: (a) was drunkly under the influence of alcohol from “E main store operated by D” located in Jinjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seojin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City; and (b) the Defendant violated the G’s bridge part of the said G G’s bridge that the said G was sent to the site upon receipt of a report 112, and the G circumstances belonging to the F District of the Seoul Special Metropolitan Police Station that was dispatched to the site, the circumstances leading up to the G, and the circumstances leading up to the police station in the former Special Metropolitan City Police Station that was dispatched to the site, and the said G’s back on a hand that the said G’s back on a hand tried to directly cause the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

2. At the time and place indicated in the above “1” clause, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victims by saying, “Sim Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mass Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D, K, and G;

1. Each statement of J, I, and H;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (joint crimes of insult);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Consideration of favorable circumstances among the following grounds for sentencing);

1. The crime of this case was committed on the grounds that the Defendant assaulted and insulting a police officer, thereby hindering the legitimate exercise of public authority, etc. under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Social Service Orders.

the terms of interest.