logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2013.06.20 2013고정401
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 27, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 2 years of suspended execution due to the damage of property at Jeju District Court on September 27, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 5, 2012.

around 04:50 on June 29, 2012, the Defendant, at the “D” convenience store located in Jeju-si, Jeju-si, Police Station E-gu, Jeju-dong, Police Station E-gu, and one other, who was dispatched to the employees, was able to take her home out of the scene, and the Defendant was able to take off the back of the patrol car, even though even her face, who was able to take off the scene.

Accordingly, the Defendant alleged that the above F was damaged and did not have any other place, and the Defendant reported the same content to 112, and by threatening the F to “I would be subject to punishment for widths, I will make a statement to the higher agency,” thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of public order and order.

around 00:40 on June 5, 2012, the Defendant, “2013 High 402, the Defendant, at the first week operated by the victim H in G at Jeju, told the victim as if the victim would drink alcohol and pay the price after the accident, and changed the alcohol and alcohol.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the drinking value even if he was provided with alcoholic beverage and alcohol at the time.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained the victim with alcohol and algorition equivalent to the market price of 100,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and H;

1. Written Statement;

1. Receipts:

1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: The defendant's legal statement, his previous disposition and report on the result of confirmation, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes significantly to this court;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of each fine for the crime;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act are applicable;

arrow