logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.07.10 2018고단1089
재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B(n, 39 years of age) of "2018 Goand 1089" are South Korea.

On May 7, 2018, at around 03:40, the Defendant was accompanied by a 4 percent of the market value of the victim’s possession, which the victim was located there, on the ground that he did not receive his own telephone, in front of the D sales outlet operated by the victim in Jeju City, at around 03:40 on May 7, 201.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

"2019 Highest 313"

1. Fraud;

A. On October 26, 2018, around 02:30 on October 26, 2018, the Defendant sent an attitude in “G entertainment tavern” operated by the Victim F in Jeju-si E to pay the alcohol value to the victim, and ordered the alcohol and alcohol.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price even if he did not have any means of payment such as cash or credit card, etc. at the time, even if he did not order it.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was provided with alcohol and alcohol equivalent to the market value of 140,000 won by the victim.

B. On November 6, 2018, the Defendant, at around 22:30, was informed of the victim I’s “Jju” operated by the victim I at H at Jeju, by the said method, and was provided by the victim with alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 120,00 in the market price.

2. On November 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) took a heavy view on the first floor of the Jeju East Police Station 66, Jeju-do, Jeju-ro, Jeju-do, and the first floor of the Jeju-dong Police Station 66 at Jeju-do, for the purpose of obstruction of performance of performance of official duties, such as “Inseeing the identity of B”, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning civil petitions by flying off the Defendant at front and returning back the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 1089"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements;

1. On-site and damaged photographs "2019No313";

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. L, N, I.

arrow