logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.04.21 2016고단1229
공기호부정사용등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of Obane whose unregistered model name is unknown.

1. On June 2014, the Defendant illegally used air defense, at the Defendant’s house located in C around 2014, attached C registration number plates, which are the number plates of the Defendant’s Otoba, which had been operated before the towing for the purpose of operating the above Otoba, to the above Oba.

Accordingly, the defendant used the marks of public offices for the purpose of exercising them.

2. On February 24, 2016, the Defendant had D, who is aware of the same facts as that set forth in paragraph 1, operate the c number plate in front of the Dongwon-si Post Office located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Dongwon-si, Dongwon-si, 465-2.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised the marks of public offices that were unlawfully used.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of present Acts and subordinate statutes under subparagraph 1 of this Article;

1. Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act (illegal use of official marks) concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 238 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 238 (2) and (1) and 34 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of an unlawful use air defense);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc. of Social Service Orders;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing of Article 48(1) of the Criminal Code of Confiscation is highly responsible that the crime of this case has been committed by attaching and operating another error board.

On the other hand, the fact of the crime is recognized, and there is a reflection that the mistake is divided.

In addition, it is also recognized that the circumstances in which the defendant submitted a written application for the birth of his wife for the reason that he had been prior to it are also recognized.

The above circumstances and other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, are as follows.

arrow