logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.11.22 2019구합23594
재심청구기각결정처분취소 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The status B of the parties is a female student attending the third grade of C Elementary School in the second grade and D is a male student attending the second grade of C Elementary School in the second grade of C Elementary School, and the plaintiff is the mother of B.

On February 9, 2019, D, such as the case of transmission of sexual photography and the holding of the first autonomous committee on countermeasures against school violence, sent to B a copy of a photo of the body photo, one of which is marked with the word “in-house garment” (hereinafter “the case of transmission of sexual photography”), and the Plaintiff reported to C Elementary School Head as school violence on the above activities of D.

Accordingly, the head of the C Elementary School decided to hold an autonomous committee for countermeasures against school violence (hereinafter “the first autonomous committee”), and the committee for countermeasures against school violence was held on February 15, 2019 by seven incumbent members, among nine incumbent members, on which the committee for countermeasures against school violence was held on February 15, 2019. The autonomous committee assessed the detailed elements of the case for transmission of sexual photography as described in the following table and taken measures against D, “in writing” under Article 17(1)1 of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against School Violence (hereinafter “School Violence Prevention Act”).

Judgment

Of 7 points for determination of elements of school violence, 6 points for 7 points for 7 points for 5 points for 7 points for 5 points for 7 points for 5 points for 7 points for 5 points for 5 points for 5 points for 3 points for 5 points for 1, 2 points for 2 points among 7 points for 7 points for 7 points for 7 points for 7 points for 5 points for 5 points for 5 points for 3 points for 1, and 2 points for 2 points for 1 point for 2 points for 7 points for 5 points for 5 points for 5 points for 1, and 3 points for 2 points for 5 points for 2 points for 2 points for 3 points for 3 points for 2 points for 3 points for 5 points for 5 points for 1,000-day school violence. However, on April 17, 2019, B was promised not to get a telephone number of 3 points for 3 points for 1.

(hereinafter referred to as “the telephone City/Do”). The Plaintiff’s telephone call to the Director of C Elementary School as above.

arrow