beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. On March 21, 2018, and March 23, 2018, the Autonomous Committee for Countermeasures against School Violence (hereinafter “Autonomous Committee”) held a meeting on March 21, 2018, and on March 23, 2018, and requested the Defendant to take measures to transfer to the Defendant and to provide special education for students for at least five hours against the Plaintiffs, who are aggressor students, who are students of the J Department, who are students of the J Department (Grade 3), pursuant to Article 17(1) of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against School Violence (hereinafter “School Violence Prevention Act”).
On March 23, 2018, the Defendant: (a) transferred the Plaintiffs and took measures for special education of students for five hours (hereinafter “each of the instant dispositions”).
[Grounds for recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 3, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the disposition is lawful;
A. The plaintiffs and their parents did not have an opportunity to state their opinions in the meeting of the autonomous committee because they were not informed in writing of the specific contents of school violence before the autonomous committee meeting was held. In addition, the defendant did not state the contents of the plaintiffs' school violence in each of the dispositions in this case, which is the reason for the disposition in this case, and did not inform them of the reason for the disposition in this case, and did not inform them of the appeal procedure regarding each of the dispositions in this case. Therefore, each of the dispositions in this case is unlawful. 2) The school violence in this case committed by the plaintiffs who abuse discretionary power in this case at the level of discipline and dys from their ship line according to the long practice of the JJ at school, and thus, it did not focus on the seriousness and intentional nature of the school violence in this case. The plaintiffs agreed with the majority of victim students and their parents, and the plaintiffs' agreement with their parents.