1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff asserted that, from September 3, 2014 to April 15, 2016, the Plaintiff was obligated to pay 8,500 won to the Plaintiff on a total of 82,891,027 won through 82 occasions as shown in the separate loan agreement, as shown in the separate loan agreement, as the Plaintiff worked for the third Deputy Director (hereinafter “the third Deputy Director”) of the Defendant’s operation from September 3, 2014 to April 15, 2016, and then lent 52,891,027 won to 8,50,000 won through 10 times as indicated in the separate loan agreement. Thus, the Defendant is obligated to pay the remainder of the borrowed money (= KRW 52,891,027 - KRW 52,50

2. It is not sufficient to acknowledge that the Plaintiff lent KRW 52,891,027 to the Defendant solely with the statement of evidence Nos. 1 through 5. The Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit, since there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Rather, comprehensively taking account of the following facts: (a) evidence Nos. 5-1, (b) 2, 3, and 4-4, and (c) 4-5 of the loan; (b) the Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant from Sep. 15, 2016 to April 2016, and served as the Deputy Director of the Tax Tribunal; (c) the Plaintiff directly operated the instant Three Deputy Director from Jan. 4, 2015 to July 14, 2016; (d) the Defendant used the Plaintiff’s payment of KRW 35,60,000 for the loan from the Defendant’s 60,000 to April 14, 2016; and (e) he/she then embezzled the amount of KRW 60,000 for the loan from the Defendant’s 60,000,000,0000 for the loan from the Defendant’s 61,601,000 won after deducting the remainder of the Plaintiff’s retirement allowance from the Defendant’s 52,81,68160,4.65,7.