logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.02.06 2017가단108945
대여금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 36,214,240 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from July 8, 2017 to the day of complete payment.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff lent the money to the defendant as follows. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the total amount of the above borrowed money and delay damages to the plaintiff.

① The Plaintiff lent KRW 36 million to the Defendant as the purchase of automobiles.

② The Plaintiff leased KRW 1,075,300 to the Defendant for the payment of automobile insurance premiums for automobiles owned by the Defendant, and received a refund of KRW 861,060 among them, and thus, shall receive the remainder of KRW 214,240.

③ The Plaintiff leased KRW 2,611,547 in total to the Defendant for the mobile game cost of Handphones. Since the Plaintiff was reimbursed KRW 720,00,000, the remainder of KRW 1,891,547 should be paid.

④ The Plaintiff lent a total of KRW 16,469,60 to the Defendant as a living expense, and as such, he/she was paid KRW 400,000 among them, he/she shall be paid the remainder of KRW 16,069,60.

2. In addition to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, evidence Nos. 7-1, 11, 30 through 33, judgment on the purchase cost of automobile and the claim for each loan on the name of automobile insurance premiums, the plaintiff loaned 9.5 million won to the defendant on December 7, 2015, 200 won on January 5, 2016, and 26.5 million won on an automobile insurance premium owned by the defendant at the defendant's request, and the plaintiff did not purchase the relevant vehicle on December 10, 2015, with a total of KRW 494,50 won on January 5, 2016, and KRW 1,075,300 on behalf of the defendant at the time of termination of the automobile insurance contract, and the plaintiff did not purchase the relevant vehicle on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendant at the time of the purchase price. However, the plaintiff did not purchase the relevant vehicle on March 10, 2016.

arrow