logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.01.19 2016고단1752
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on December 1, 2005, issued a summary order of KRW 1,00,000,000,000 as fine for the same crime in the same court on September 11, 2014, and on November 26, 2015, with the same crime, at the same court, issued a fine of KRW 6,00,00,000 as fine for the same crime.

[Criminal facts] On July 18, 2016, the Defendant driven a Daring vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.212% while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license from around 4000 meters from the front of the 401-4 CU convenience store to the front road of the Matern C in Ansan-si, Matern vehicle at around 17:00 on July 18, 2016

The Defendant, on September 11, 2014, issued a summary order of KRW 7 million with a fine of KRW 6 million at the same court on November 26, 2015, respectively, due to the same offense in violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon District Court’s Eunpyeong District Court’s Eunpyeong District Court’s House on September 11, 2014, and was charged with the same offense in the same court on August 31, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On November 16, 2016, the Defendant driven the E-Poter Cargo Vehicles without obtaining a driver’s license from the front of the Taeduk Health Center located in the Masan-dong in Ansan-si to the same City Corporation from around 49 to the road before the 300-meter road before the 49 Samsung Fambling Card.

2. On November 27, 2016, the Defendant driven a E-Poter cargo vehicle under the influence of alcohol of 0.188 percent with alcohol content 0.18 percent at a distance of about 300 meters from the front of the Taeduk Health Center located in the Mansan-dong in the same city of Sinsan-si.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who had driven a motor vehicle on more than two occasions, was driving a motor vehicle without the license under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The written statement of the defendant;

1. Notification of the results of regulating the driving of drinking, the driver's license ledger, and a survey report on actual condition;

1. Inquiries about criminal history and the application of the Act and subordinate statutes of 1.1.

arrow