Defendants are not guilty. The summary of this judgment is to be disclosed to the Defendants.

1. The summary of the facts charged was that Defendant B supplied the victim D with raw materials, such as salted sled, and the price was not paid. Defendant A was aware of the aforementioned circumstances as the head, and E and F are employees of G operated by Defendant A.

1. On June 2012, Defendant A heard that the victim would not pay the price from G Office G located in Gyeonggi-si, Ha in the Hamnam-si, Hamnnam-si, and Defendant B told that “if the consent is not obtained on June 20, 2012, the victim’s office is sought to return money, and if the money is not given, the victim’s office is required to return the money, it would bring about the thing located therein.”

In addition, on June 20, 2012, the defendant stated that the defendant's house located in the Chinese Dda Development District would bring B to E and F by telephone from the defendant's house to B and in the victim's office.

At around 15:00 on June 21, 2012, the Defendant: (a) instigated a special larceny by having the said B, E, and F enter into the J office for the operation of the I victim of the Gyeonggi-si, the Defendant, at around 15:00, he had the said office; (b) had the said B, E, and F enter into the two truck truck with the summary 2, summary 18, and one excessive cream in advance; and (c) had the said office executed the operation of the I victim of the Gyeonggi-si.

2. Defendant B, along with the above E and F, stolen a vehicle on June 21, 2012 at the J office in the operation of the above victim, by means of loading two trucks, which had been prepared in advance at the victim’s market price of 6 million won or more, at the J office in the operation of the above victim.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's goods together with E and F.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the record of the judgment, namely, the transaction of goods with Defendant B in the course of operating the J, is not D, but K. K misrepresentation at the time and did not pay the goods from Defendant B in the name of Defendant B, and K prepares a document of borrowing money in the name of Defendant B without paying the goods from Defendant B.