beta
Text
1. On August 5, 2010, the Defendant: (a) against Plaintiff A, KRW 13,715,719, KRW 31,143,812, and each of the above amounts to Plaintiff B and C.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The Defendant is a person engaged in the water business with the trade name of “E”. Around August 5, 2010, the Defendant was in charge of the removal of buildings of “G” located in “G” located in “G” in “G” and the network H (hereinafter “the network”).
A) On August 5, 2010, the deceased employed and employed I to dismantle the above building. 2) On August 11:5, 2010, at around 11:55, the deceased worked to separate and remove the C-type lectures from steel structure with the steel structure with the mountain bed, and I performed assistive work by the deceased, such as cutting the sloping. The deceased was at the time when I did not take a bridge to replace the sloping to a different reduction, and was at the 3.8-meter height of the deceased.
(3) After that, the Deceased died on August 22, 2010, when he was sent to the Joseon University Hospital and was under medical treatment, the Deceased died on the multi-presidential period, etc. (03:55) around August 22, 2010. (4) The Plaintiff A is the deceased’s wife, and the Plaintiff B and C are the deceased’s children.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's statements in Gap's 1 to 4, 6, and 7 (including each number in case of a tentative number), the purport of the whole pleadings
B. The judgment of the defendant, as the operator of E employed the deceased, is responsible for safety consideration for the deceased, who is an employee. Since the accident of this case occurred due to having the deceased conduct the cutting work of the steel structure using a melting machine at a height of about 3.8 meters without installing a safety net, etc., the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the accident of this case.
C. However, according to the above evidence, the deceased is obligated to take safety measures on his own in the course of using contact work, but the accident of this case occurred while using contact work without I assist the deceased's work. Such negligence of the deceased is also caused by the accident of this case.