logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2015.08.11 2015가단200974
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. The facts of recognition

1) The Plaintiff A’s husband is the deceased F (hereinafter “the deceased”).

(A) On January 2, 2013, the Plaintiff completed the work on January 2, 2013 and attended a meeting, and then on January 3, 2013, 1:30 of the following day after the date of the meeting, G, and Gwangju apartment E 203-dong (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

2) On the same day, G, at around 2:16 of the same day, was on the 140-meter away from the present site of the apartment of this case, G, with the deceased, arrived at a place lower than 140 meters away from the present site of the apartment of this case, and entered the apartment of this case as 1101, which is an accommodation alone. However, the deceased, while under the influence of alcohol from 2:37 to 2:4 on the same day, went back to the corner of the apartment of this case, she went to a street parking lot. On the same day, at around 2:55, the parking lot was anticipated at a vehicle parked on the side of the retaining wall of the apartment of this case, and the parking lot was lowered below the retaining wall of this case, and around 14:20 on the same day, it was discovered (hereinafter “the accident of this case”).

(2) 2) The death cause of the Deceased on the body of the deceased prepared on January 3, 2013 by H physician I on the body of the deceased on the body of the deceased on the body of January 3, 2013, and there was no other external wounds as well as the face of the deceased and the chest.

B. The plaintiffs B, C, and D are children of the deceased.

C. The defendant is the council of occupants' representatives composed of occupants for the management of the apartment of this case.

According to the attached Table 1 of the management rules of the apartment of this case, the parking lot of the apartment of this case is included in the subject of management by the defendant, and the defendant entered into an entrustment management contract with the members comprehensive management company on August 31, 201 on the subject of management in the attached Table 1 of the management rules of the apartment of this case.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1-4, Eul evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 4-13 and video number No. 4 shall include each number, unless there is a separate indication.

arrow