Text
1. The part of the lawsuit filed by an independent party intervenor for confirmation shall be dismissed;
2. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B shall be KRW 78,835,331.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The remaining Defendants except Defendant J, Defendant E, P, and Q (hereinafter “Defendant C, etc.”) are owners of O-owned houses on the ground of Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, with the intention to remove the said apartment houses and to build the 14th floor building on the ground of the said land (hereinafter “instant reconstruction project”), and obtained permission from the head of Bupyeong-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant reconstruction project”).
After that, on January 28, 2005, a contract for the implementation of the reconstruction project of this case was entered into with the Koduk Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Cuk Development").
B. (1) On January 2005, Co., Ltd. and Defendant C et al. entered into a contract for the construction of the instant building (hereinafter “instant construction”). Defendant C et al. entered into a contract for the construction of the said construction to pay KRW 1,870,00,00 as the construction cost (excluding value added tax) to the said comprehensive construction, and around that time, Defendant C et al. had S actually implement the entire construction of the said construction.
The first condition of the base land: Within 3 days after the new installation of the concrete in the second floor of the pel structure (180 million won): the second anniversary of the new installation of the concrete in the pel structure (180 million won): the third anniversary of the new installation of the slab concrete in the 8th floor of the pel structure (100 million won): within 3 days (180 million won) after the new installation of the pel structure 14th floor slab concrete in the pel structure: the remainder of the construction cost after the completion of the original construction of the Y (180 million won): the first payment in the sale price, while the sub-development of the pel structure and the defendant C et al. entered into a contract with the following changes in the construction cost.
The project for the development of virtue and the comprehensive development of virtue C, etc. shall be implemented in the manner of final shares.
The virtue development is the framework of the building in this case to the original comprehensive development.