logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2021.02.03 2020고단2140
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 29, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking) from the Busan District Court and the Busan District Court issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking) at the Busan District Court’s Busan District Court’s branch on July 24, 2012.

On August 3, 2020, around 02:0, the Defendant driven a B-A6 vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.244% while under the influence of alcohol in the direction of approximately 1km from the road located in the south-gu Busan to the front of the office of support for education on South-west, which is located in a 29-ro of the same Gu.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving of a vehicle B A6 car.

On August 3, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol, as described in paragraph 1 of around 02:00, and led D ahead of the road in Busan Southern-gu C, to the south-gu Office from the side of the E market.

At night, there was a duty of care to operate safely by accurately manipulating the brakes and steering gear while living well on the right and the right and the right and the right of the person engaged in driving of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant did not discover Gland Lone Star Cornex, which was driven by the victim F ( South and North 40 years old) who was under the influence of the Defendant’s operation in front of the direction of the Defendant’s operation and was under the influence of the Defendant’s operation, and the Defendant stated in the indictment on the side of the above passenger vehicle’s and the victim’s vehicle’s collision in the front side of the right side of the said passenger vehicle that the Defendant drives, as the front side of the said passenger vehicle’s operation.

B was shocked.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1...

arrow