A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 1373"

1. Around 04:26 on February 29, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (i.e., the following measures): (a) operated two-lane roads in front of D real estate in the wife population C by driving a BAD car on February 29, 2016, and driving the Fump truck parkeded by the victim E with the median line under the influence of alcohol while driving the two-lane roads in front of D real estate in the wife population C at the time of tolerance-si; and (b) went away from the road without immediately stopping the said truck to cause about one million won for repair and damage; and (c) went away from the road without leaving the said vehicle on the road.

2. On February 29, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven a B-A6 car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.149% while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.149% while under the influence of alcohol level of the blood without a vehicle driver’s license from the section from the 04:20 on February 29, 2016 to the front road located in the same Gu from the 04:20 to the 3rd road in the same Gu.

"2016 Highest 1615"

3. On February 24, 2016, the Defendant was driving a B-A-A-car without a driver’s license on the front of the “H” week located in Suwon-si G at Suwon-si, Suwon-si on February 24, 2016.

4. On February 24, 2016, the Defendant driven a vehicle under the influence of alcohol by the Defendant, such as: (a) the receipt of a report of drinking traffic accidents on the road front of the main point of “H” located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si on February 24, 2016; (b) the Defendant snicking with severe drinking in his/her entrance; and (c) the Defendant snicking on his/her face.

For about 30 minutes from the Department of Justice in charge of the guard of the police station of the Suwon Southern Police Station, there is a reasonable reason to designate a person, the police officer of the department of the department of the department of the police station of the department of the department of the department of the police station

As a result, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's request for alcohol testing without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 order 1373]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a case;

1. Written appraisal of alcohol during blood;